teaching with writing
Business
Administration 1910: Freshman Seminar
Jerry
Rinehart
I. Course
Description
Critical
thinking is essential for success in college and in careers. This seminar
will engage students in analyzing a series of case studies reflecting
decision-making situations which students and student leaders often confront
during their college years. In the process of exploring these cases, students
will develop a better understanding of leadership, and they will experience
a variety of approaches to problem solving and analysis. Critical thinking
skills will be developed as students explore underlying issues, recognize
core problems, and identify potential solutions. In the process of expressing
their perspectives, students will also sharpen their understanding of
persuasive communication.
Text: A Casebook
for Student Leaders, Holkboer and Hoeksema, Houghton-Mifflin, 1998. Available
in the West Bank Bookstore (Smith Hall)
II. Assignments
A. Individual
Assignments:
1. Two
individual case write ups (500-750 words each). The two cases you will
be writing on will be assigned.
Your write up will take the form of a well-organized essay, with a thesis
statement, main body, and conclusion. As you analyze the case, consider
the following general questions, but do not limit your response to merely
answering these questions. Additional information and background to
assist your case analysis write ups will be presented during class.
a. What
is the real problem?
b. What values and/or value conflicts are involved in this case?
c. What ideas or concepts from class discussions or presentations
are useful in analyzing this case?
d. What is the best solution? Why?
Although
you may choose to discuss your case with your team mates, your paper is
to be an original work, independently developed and written.
2. Written
responses to two of the three Minnesota Mutual Leadership Lecturers.
Due dates are listed on the course calendar.
Questions to help frame your responses:
a. What
were the key or main ideas presented?
b. In what ways did the speaker contribute to your self-awareness
or to your understanding of leadership, values or ethics?
c. What are the implicit or explicit values or value conflicts that
are relevant to this presentation?
d. In what ways do you see yourself similar or different to the speaker
in terms of values, attitudes etc.?
One of the
two Minnesota Mutual responses should be reviewed with your team members
and revised prior to submission based on your team members' reactions
and suggestions. Submit the original draft, the team members' comments,
and your revised response as a portfolio.
See comments above regarding the importance of independent development
and authorship of these papers.
B. Team Assignments
1. Facilitating
Case Discussion: Each team will facilitate discussion of two separate
cases and prepare a brief persuasive paper related to the case. The
persuasive essay should be three to four pages (typed, 750-1000 words)
and written to support your group's recommended solution. The cases
your team will prepare will be assigned.
a. What
to record in your discussions and report on in your presentations.
(These are suggestions—they are not to be considered as the "outline" for
your presentations. Be creative!) The formal case write up should
present this information in the form of a well-organized essay.
What
is the problem?
· What is the problem as seen by each character in the case?
· Is there information missing from the case that would make
your solution easier to derive?
· List the key issues in the case.
· What did your group agree on?
· What were areas of disagreement.
What
are possible solutions?
· What are some realistic options for the protagonist?
· List the three best solutions.
· List the advantages and disadvantages of each solution.
· List options that were dismissed as impractical or undesirable
and the main reason they were dismissed.
What
is the best solution?
· What values is this judgment based upon?
· What are some possible applications or lessons that can be
derived from this case?
b. As
part of your presentation, you might also lead the class through "Questions
to Guide Discussion" and to the "Case in Point" questions.
Determine ways to make your presentation interactive with the class
members.
2. Final
Team Projects
Identify
a controversial issue, event, or activity involving ethics, values or
leadership that is occurring on campus this semester. This could be
something occurring on a very local level (e.g. something happening
in your dorm) or something that is more campus or state wide. Your team
will need to submit a one-paragraph explanation of two possible topics
to me by October 24, 2002.
For the Final Project:
· Meet with your group to come up with two possible topics that
you would be interested in using for the final project. Submit these
two ideas to the instructor by 6:00 p.m. on October 24. You will be notified
within two days regarding which topic was approved.
· Write
up a summary of the situation following the format used in our Casebook
for Student Leaders (approximately 500 words). If available, include
newspaper articles, Web site information, or any other relevant materials
as appendices to your write up.
· Apply
questions and analytical approaches to this situation similar to
those we have used for the formal case discussions. You will submit
your written responses to these questions as the written component
of the final project (approximately 500 words).
· Prepare
an interactive presentation in which you engage the class and lead
them through your analysis and solutions. These presentations will
occur during the final two class sessions.
· Your team
presentations will occur the final class period.
III. Grading:
1. You can
earn up to 100 points. Grades will be based upon the following:
| Participation:(see
below) |
20
points |
| Two
Individual Case Write Ups: |
15
pts each = 30 |
| Two
Minnesota Mutual Lecture responses: |
7.5
pts each = 15 |
| Two
Team Discussion Facilitation: |
10
pts. each = 20 |
| Final
Team Projects |
25 |
2. Some of
the factors that will determine your Participation Points are the following:
- Attendance
- Quality
and quantity of oral contributions to class
- Attentiveness
to class discussion and fellow classmates
- Performance
on in-class exercises
- Teammates'
evaluation of your performance on team projects
3. Team contracts
During the
first two weeks of the term, you need to meet with your team members and
agree upon the following:
- How you
want your team to function together?
- What level
of effort you expect from each other and as a team?
- What problems
you want to avoid?
- What you
will do if you encounter problems in working together (including, what
you will do if a problem persists even after having discussed it) ?
Once you
have agreed upon the terms, write up your team contract. Each team member
needs to sign the contract. Submit one copy to your instructor on September
26, 2002. Each member should also retain a copy.
Course
Calendar
| Date
|
Classroom
Activity |
Assignments
Due |
|
1.
9/5
|
Introductions
and overview; Expectations; Case Study Methods; Critical Thinking:
sample case |
|
|
2.
9/12
|
Leadership, Decision-Making and ValuesCase Discussion: Midnight
Hacker |
"What
is Ethics?"-on ClassNet
Complete
Rokeach Values Inventory
Notes
on Midnight Hacker questions
|
|
3.
9/19 |
No Class: Attend Leadership Perspectives lecture on 9/26,
12:00-1:00. View videotape of lecture if unable to attend in person.
Write-up due Thursday, 10/3 |
Complete
Rokeach Values Team Meetings for Presentations and Final Project
Planning |
|
4.
9/26 |
Exploration
of Capitalism
Guest lecturer: Richard Goldman |
Attend
Leadership Perspectives lecture at 12:00: Bruce Roselle; write up
due 10/3.
Team Contracts due |
|
5.
10/3 |
Self-Assessment:
Discussion of MBTI Leadership: Values and Team Dynamics
Case Presentations:
The Charity Case—Team 1
Crisis of Conscience—Team 2
Smoldering Volcano -Team 3 |
Complete
MBTI Leadership Perspectives Lecture
- Paper due |
|
6.
10/10 |
Leadership
Characteristics; Priorities and Time Management
Case Presentations:
Team 4: Rockdale Scandal
Team 5: Buried Secret
(Distribute "Team Roles: Self-Perception Inventory") |
Read: "What's
In it For Me"
Team Presentations or Individual write-ups as assigned |
|
7.
10/17 |
Discussion
of Team Role Inventory |
Complete
Team Roles Inventory |
| 8.
10/24 |
No
Class: Attend Leadership Lecture at 12:00-1:00 p.m. |
Attend
Leadership Perspective Lecture: David
Oreck; write-up due 10/31/02
Submit
Two Ideas for Final Project Topics by 4:00 p.m. |
| 9.
10/31 |
OPEN
TOPICS: Critical thinking and leadership in current events |
Leadership
Perspectives Lecture: Paper due.
Bring
articles or notes on two issues relevant to course discussions on
values, critical thinking and leadership. |
| 10.
11/7 |
Thinking
Critically about Leadership and Diversity: Case
Presentations
La Raza Derecha: Team 1 Celebration of Whiteness: Team 2 |
Team
Presentations or Individual write-ups as assigned
Team
Meetings for Final Projects |
| 11.
11/14 |
Thinking
Critically about Individual Rights: Case Presentations
Defender's Dilemma: Team 3
World's Apart: Team 4
Mind of the Beholder: Team 5 |
Team
Presentations or Individual write-ups as assigned
Team
Meetings for Final Project |
| 12.
11/21 |
Mn.
Mutual Lecture: 12:00-1:00 p.m/Team meetings with Instructor
(20 minute meeting between 3:30 and 5:30 in lieu of class meeting) |
Attend
Leadership Perspectives Lecture:
Linda Mona; Write up due 11/27
Team
Meetings with Instructor to discuss final projects |
| 13.
11/28 |
Thanksgiving: No Class |
Leadership
Perspectives Paper due 11/27 |
| 14.
12/5 |
Critical
Thinking and Leadership: Class Analysis of "Loneliness of
Long Distance Runner" |
Readings
on Title IX |
| 15.
12/12 |
Final Presentations |
Final
Team Projects Due |
Source:
Rinehart,
Jerry. Business Administration 1910: Freshman Seminar. Carlson
School of Management, University of Minnesota. 11 Nov. 2002. <http://legacy.csom.umn.edu/
Classnet/CM2Fal02.cfm?p=150>.
|