Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.


  

teaching with writing

What Students Ask about Writing Assignments

The staff of the campus-wide writing program at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa interviewed over 200 students about their experiences in writing intensive classes. Their responses—which will seem very familiar to any experienced teacher—can be condensed into four questions:

  1. “How will the writing assignment help me to learn the course material?

    It's easy to forget that the purpose of an assignment isn't automatically clear to students. Explicitly linking it to the goals of the course will help students see the value of an assignment. Saying something like “I want to be sure you understand the difference between Concept A and Concept B” or “Your notebooks show what you've learned about collecting and evaluating data” confirms that an assignment is a way of learning the material, not busy work.

  2. “If you had to do this assignment yourself, how would you do it?”

    In addition to encountering new ideas, students are often encountering new cognitive tasks. Models are especially helpful in such cases. For example, if you're asking students to evaluate research methodology, you might demonstrate ways that can be done or provide a printed example with key features marked.

  3. “How does this writing assignment or topic relate to the work that specialists do in this field?”

    Such a question is most likely to occur in advanced classes as students think more in terms of professionalism. In fields where written records have legal implications, that concern ought to be stressed; questions about the amount and type of writing done on the job might be asked of visiting professionals as well.

  4. “If you evaluate my work on this assignment, what exactly will you be looking for?”

    A clear statement of criteria for evaluating written work can be provided in the course syllabus or the assignment itself. The answer to this question should be clearly connected to the purpose of the assignment as well. Here, too, examples of successful papers can be helpful.
What Instructors Expect
What Students Understand
“For the short paper on a video, I wanted students to make connections among the archeologist's questions, the methods used to get answers, and principles from their reading.” “This assignment was like writing a high-school movie review. I wanted to give my own personal understanding about the video, so I was going to write a narrative.”
“In the journals I wanted students to really wield their own opinions and grapple with issues, to really think about course material.” “When I first heard the assignment, I thought I was supposed to write anything, like a reaction, just to show if I learned something.”
“I wanted students to really wrestle with the questions on the assignment sheet, to give in-depth answers. I wanted students to distinguish between the author's words and their own interpretation.” “I was supposed to write a 6-page analysis on a reading and juice up the answers. I tried to make it sound good by adding lots of details and sounding excited in my writing.”

When we asked experienced WI instructors to analyze instructor expectations and student understandings, here is some of what we found:

  1. Students translate an instructor's goals into processes they think they can handle.

    An instructor's desire to have students “grapple with issues” becomes for the student “to write anything, like a reaction, just to show if I learned something.” Translations such as this point to significant gaps in students' understanding of the instructors' purposes and expectations.

  2. Students enter WI classes with strategies they devised to deal with earlier writing assignments, and they may try to use these strategies again rather than risk something new.

    For example, the student who tried to make “a 6-page analysis . . . sound good by adding lots of details and sounding excited” had learned to try to please the teacher and thus to win the “A.” Sometimes prior experiences promote new learning; at other times they impede learning.

Source: Mānoa Writing Program, University of Hawaii at Mānoa. http://mwp01.mwp.hawaii.edu/wm1.htm. May 12, 2003.

 

10 Nicholson Hall
216 Pillsbury Drive SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455

writing@umn.edu
612.626.7579
fax 612.626.7580
The Center for Writing appreciates acknowledgments for reproduced or adapted materials found on this site. Please send comments or queries to writing@umn.edu. ©2003 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The U of M is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Trouble seeing the text?
 |  Contact U of M  Privacy  Last modified on August 9, 2007.
center for writing home